What Are The Disadvantages Of Cucumber Frameworks?

Gartner asserted that behaviour-driven development (BDD) promoted "agility" and boosted "collaboration" back in 2015. With new frameworks and technologies that use BDD, development and testing are more integrated than ever. One such framework is the Cucumber testing tool, whose objective is to standardise the creation, evaluation, and documentation of feature specifications for developers, testers, and analysts. This article will discuss the Cucumber Framework and how it may aid in the creation of better products by you and your team.

BDD typically aims to include all of a project's key stakeholders in the development and testing phases. It concentrates more on creating test scripts that cater to business (customer) and technical (developer) needs.

Although having its roots in test-driven development (TDD), which isolates and tests each component, BDD is a more comprehensive method of advancing development. This is because it emphasises the system's behaviour as a whole and makes effective communication about the same possible.

Cucumber is one of the most well-liked open-source tools for implementing BDD. It enables the development of more complex requirements or scenarios that can be tested and executed using the Gherkin platform for natural language programming. These scenarios are fundamentally written in Given-When-Then, a human-readable format.

The Cucumber testing framework's advantage is that it divides feature design and implementation into tiny, doable chunks. If there isn't a solution, it merely indicates that the test is flawed. It aids in finding the best answer to a problem.

This is how a project gradually loses its ambiguity and increases its dependability. Additionally, the test can be scaled to fit the requirements and level of comprehension displayed by cross-functional teams.

The disadvantages of cucumber frameworks

1)Gherkin is unquestionably the foundation of Cucumber. But, it can make things more complicated by making it more difficult to say what needs to be said. The general Gherkin language can be overly complex and unnecessary for something particular. Also, because text editors need help understanding its syntax as a common language, it suffers from technical disadvantages when used with them.

2)The framework is a valuable tool for implementing test scenarios, although it can be unnecessarily lengthy, and duplicate information can result. Such step definitional elaboration could be more efficient because stakeholders are barely considered. Why not make them exact and appropriate for their intended use if only the developers must read through them?

Conclusion:

This article will help me know more about cucumber frameworks' disadvantages. To learn more about cucumber frameworks, join Cucumber Bdd Online Training at FITA Academy.